[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230422113811.GB1215777@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2023 13:38:11 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Loongson (and other $ARCHs?) idle VS timer enqueue
On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 10:08:14AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 06:47:29PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> > > *HOWEVER*
> > >
> > > intel_idle_irq() is affected -- except that we only (normally) use that
> > > for very shallow idle states and it won't interact with NOHZ (because we
> > > only disable the tick for deep idle states).
> >
> > Well I don't know, that doesn't look comfortable... :)
> >
> > Also why does it need to enable IRQs if ecx=1 ?
>
> Supposedly this is some interrupt latency hack. See commit:
>
> c227233ad64c ("intel_idle: enable interrupts before C1 on Xeons")
Something like so perhaps...
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h
index 778df05f8539..07a4072c43de 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h
@@ -115,8 +115,14 @@ static __always_inline void mwait_idle_with_hints(unsigned long eax, unsigned lo
}
__monitor((void *)¤t_thread_info()->flags, 0, 0);
- if (!need_resched())
- __mwait(eax, ecx);
+ if (!need_resched()) {
+ if (ecx & 1) {
+ __mwait(eax, ecx);
+ } else {
+ __sti_mwait(eax, ecx);
+ raw_local_irq_disable();
+ }
+ }
}
current_clr_polling();
}
diff --git a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
index 938c17f25d94..4a823bd0f5e0 100644
--- a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
+++ b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
@@ -130,11 +130,12 @@ static unsigned int mwait_substates __initdata;
#define MWAIT2flg(eax) ((eax & 0xFF) << 24)
static __always_inline int __intel_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
- struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int index)
+ struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
+ int index, bool irqoff)
{
struct cpuidle_state *state = &drv->states[index];
unsigned long eax = flg2MWAIT(state->flags);
- unsigned long ecx = 1; /* break on interrupt flag */
+ unsigned long ecx = 1*irqoff; /* break on interrupt flag */
mwait_idle_with_hints(eax, ecx);
@@ -158,19 +159,13 @@ static __always_inline int __intel_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
static __cpuidle int intel_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int index)
{
- return __intel_idle(dev, drv, index);
+ return __intel_idle(dev, drv, index, true);
}
static __cpuidle int intel_idle_irq(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int index)
{
- int ret;
-
- raw_local_irq_enable();
- ret = __intel_idle(dev, drv, index);
- raw_local_irq_disable();
-
- return ret;
+ return __intel_idle(dev, drv, index, false);
}
static __cpuidle int intel_idle_ibrs(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
@@ -183,7 +178,7 @@ static __cpuidle int intel_idle_ibrs(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
if (smt_active)
native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, 0);
- ret = __intel_idle(dev, drv, index);
+ ret = __intel_idle(dev, drv, index, true);
if (smt_active)
native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, spec_ctrl);
@@ -195,7 +190,7 @@ static __cpuidle int intel_idle_xstate(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int index)
{
fpu_idle_fpregs();
- return __intel_idle(dev, drv, index);
+ return __intel_idle(dev, drv, index, true);
}
/**
Powered by blists - more mailing lists