lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 22 Apr 2023 15:31:18 -0700
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Liang Kan <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
        <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
        <mark.rutland@....com>, <will@...nel.org>
CC:     <mingo@...hat.com>, <acme@...nel.org>, <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        <linuxarm@...wei.com>, <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        "Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 4/5] perf: CXL Performance Monitoring Unit driver

Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> CXL rev 3.0 introduces a standard performance monitoring hardware
> block to CXL. Instances are discovered using CXL Register Locator DVSEC
> entries. Each CXL component may have multiple PMUs.
> 
> This initial driver supports a subset of types of counter.
> It supports counters that are either fixed or configurable, but requires
> that they support the ability to freeze and write value whilst frozen.
> 
> Development done with QEMU model which will be posted shortly.
> 
> Example:
> 
> $ perf stat -e cxl_pmu_mem0.0/h2d_req_snpcur/ -e cpmu0/h2d_req_snpdata/ -e cpmu0/clock_ticks/ sleep 1
> 
> Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
> 
> 96,757,023,244,321      cxl_pmu_mem0.0/h2d_req_snpcur/
> 96,757,023,244,365      cxl_pmu_mem0.0/h2d_req_snpdata/
> 193,514,046,488,653      cxl_pmu_mem0.0/clock_ticks/
> 
>        1.090539600 seconds time elapsed
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>

Jonathan, I was awaiting a "perf maintainer ack" before applying this,
only to now realize there is no maintainer entry for drivers/perf/ in
general, only "ARM PMU PROFILING AND DEBUGGING". Were you waiting on any
additional acks from perf folks for this?

If there are no objections I think this can be included in the back half
of the merge window for v6.4, as it stands now I was still awaiting the
final go ahead.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ