[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230424160908.44c80452@rorschach.local.home>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 16:09:08 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>, catalin.marinas@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org, kpsingh@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org,
xukuohai@...weicloud.com, lihuafei1@...wei.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Add ftrace direct call for arm64
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:50:21 +0100
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> Perhaps we could queue 1 and 2 via the arm64 tree, 3 and 4 via the ftrace tree,
> and follow up with patch 5 via the bpf tree after -rc1?
Any patches that you want through the ftrace tree, please send as a
separate queue to the linux-trace-kernel mailing list (and lkml) if you
haven't done that already. I'm still a thousand emails behind, and
walking through them while at the airport lounge.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists