[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <l3adl3saeqovypmluubddp6kqcjducn75ifpf63ylbecuprpi3@gpoks434n4yg>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 00:18:04 +0200
From: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
To: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Adam Skladowski <a39.skl@...il.com>,
Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Rajesh Yadav <ryadav@...eaurora.org>,
Jeykumar Sankaran <jsanka@...eaurora.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Chandan Uddaraju <chandanu@...eaurora.org>,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>,
Jami Kettunen <jami.kettunen@...ainline.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jordan Crouse <jordan@...micpenguin.net>,
Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>,
Sravanthi Kollukuduru <skolluku@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/17] drm/msm/dpu: Remove TE2 block and feature from
DPU >= 7.0.0 hardware
On 2023-04-24 13:41:07, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>
>
> On 4/17/2023 1:21 PM, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > No hardware beyond kona (sm8250) defines the TE2 PINGPONG sub-block
> > offset downstream. Even though neither downstream nor upstream utilizes
> > these registers in any way, remove the erroneous specification for
> > SC8280XP, SM8350 and SM8450 to prevent confusion.
> >
> > Note that downstream enables the PPSPLIT (split-FIFO) topology (single
> > LM for 2 PP and 2 INTF) based on the presence of a TE2 block.
> >
> > Fixes: f0a1bdf64dd7 ("drm/msm/dpu: Introduce SC8280XP")
> > Fixes: 0a72f23f6ef8 ("drm/msm/dpu: Add SM8350 to hw catalog")
> > Fixes: 8cbbc3396065 ("drm/msm/dpu: add support for SM8450")
>
> I cannot find any commits with those hashes.
>
> Should this be
>
> Fixes: 4a352c2fc15a ("drm/msm/dpu: Introduce SC8280XP")
> Fixes: 0e91bcbb0016 ("drm/msm/dpu: Add SM8350 to hw catalog")
> Fixes: 100d7ef6995d ("drm/msm/dpu: add support for SM8450")
Yes they are, thanks for spotting that. These patches were on drm-msm
/ msm-next when I made this patch on January 11th, hence these were the
hashes given to me by git bisect: see how those patches have an author
timestamp of January 9th, while the proper hashes that landed upstream
have a hash of January 12th: the branch has been force-pushed after.
Old:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/commit/f0a1bdf64dd7
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/commit/0a72f23f6ef8
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/commit/8cbbc3396065
New:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/commit/4a352c2fc15a
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/commit/0e91bcbb0016
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/commit/100d7ef6995d
> Will wait for a day to fix this up, otherwise I will do it while applying.
Thanks, that's appreciated.
- Marijn
> > Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_7_0_sm8350.h | 4 ++--
> > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_8_0_sc8280xp.h | 12 ++++++------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_8_1_sm8450.h | 4 ++--
> > 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
<snip>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists