[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202304241556.fafzkLLk-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 15:35:35 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com>, mani@...nel.org,
miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, quic_srichara@...cinc.com,
quic_mdalam@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Implement exec_op()
Hi Md,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on mtd/nand/next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.3 next-20230421]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Md-Sadre-Alam/mtd-rawnand-qcom-Implement-exec_op/20230419-173849
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mtd/linux.git nand/next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230419093617.27134-1-quic_mdalam%40quicinc.com
patch subject: [PATCH V2] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Implement exec_op()
config: nios2-randconfig-m041-20230423 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230424/202304241556.fafzkLLk-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: nios2-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202304241556.fafzkLLk-lkp@intel.com/
smatch warnings:
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c:2751 qcom_read_status_exec() warn: inconsistent indenting
vim +2751 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
2708
2709 static int qcom_read_status_exec(struct nand_chip *chip,
2710 const struct nand_subop *subop)
2711 {
2712 struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip);
2713 struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
2714 struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = &chip->ecc;
2715 struct qcom_op q_op;
2716 const struct nand_op_instr *instr = NULL;
2717 unsigned int op_id = 0;
2718 unsigned int len = 0;
2719 int ret = 0, num_cw = 1, i;
2720 u32 flash_status;
2721
2722 host->status = NAND_STATUS_READY | NAND_STATUS_WP;
2723
2724 qcom_parse_instructions(chip, subop, &q_op);
2725
2726 if (nandc->exec_opwrite) {
2727 num_cw = ecc->steps;
2728 nandc->exec_opwrite = false;
2729 }
2730
2731 pre_command(host, NAND_CMD_STATUS);
2732
2733 nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_FLASH_CMD, q_op.cmd_reg);
2734 nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_EXEC_CMD, 1);
2735
2736 write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_FLASH_CMD, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
2737 write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_EXEC_CMD, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
2738
2739 read_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_FLASH_STATUS, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
2740
2741 ret = submit_descs(nandc);
2742 if (ret)
2743 dev_err(nandc->dev, "failure in sbumitting status descriptor\n");
2744
2745 free_descs(nandc);
2746
2747 nandc_read_buffer_sync(nandc, true);
2748 for (i = 0; i < num_cw; i++) {
2749 flash_status = le32_to_cpu(nandc->reg_read_buf[i]);
2750
> 2751 if (flash_status & FS_MPU_ERR)
2752 host->status &= ~NAND_STATUS_WP;
2753
2754 if (flash_status & FS_OP_ERR || (i == (num_cw - 1) &&
2755 (flash_status & FS_DEVICE_STS_ERR)))
2756 host->status |= NAND_STATUS_FAIL;
2757 }
2758
2759 flash_status = host->status;
2760
2761 instr = q_op.data_instr;
2762 op_id = q_op.data_instr_idx;
2763 len = nand_subop_get_data_len(subop, op_id);
2764 memcpy(instr->ctx.data.buf.in, &flash_status, len);
2765
2766 return ret;
2767 }
2768
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests
Powered by blists - more mailing lists