[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230424094730.105313-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 10:47:30 +0100
From: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
To: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next][V3] rv: Fix addition on an uninitialized variable 'run'
The variable run is not initialized however it is being accumulated
by the return value from the call to ikm_run_monitor. Fix this by
initializing run to zero at the start of the function.
Fixes: 4bc4b131d44c ("rv: Add rv tool")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
---
V2: Initialize run rather than assign it from return from ikm_run_monitor
V3: Add missing V3 and next in patch subject
---
tools/verification/rv/src/rv.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/verification/rv/src/rv.c b/tools/verification/rv/src/rv.c
index e601cd9c411e..1ddb85532816 100644
--- a/tools/verification/rv/src/rv.c
+++ b/tools/verification/rv/src/rv.c
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static void rv_list(int argc, char **argv)
static void rv_mon(int argc, char **argv)
{
char *monitor_name;
- int i, run;
+ int i, run = 0;
static const char *const usage[] = {
"",
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists