lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d29c4b3e-9e82-4ea9-9f0c-a8e2c7637eb9@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 24 Apr 2023 12:48:19 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Li Ningke <lnk_01@...t.edu.cn>
Cc:     hust-os-kernel-patches@...glegroups.com,
        Dongliang Mu <dzm91@...t.edu.cn>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: davinci: Remove dead code in `davinci_spi_probe()`

On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 03:24:46AM +0000, Li Ningke wrote:
> Smatch complains that
> drivers/spi/spi-davinci.c:915 davinci_spi_probe() warn:
> platform_get_irq() does not return zero
> 
> There is no need to check whether the return value is zero as
> `platform_get_irq()` only returns non-zero IRQ number on success
> or negative error number on failure, removing them to solve this
> problem.

Is that check valid?  0 was a valid interrupt for some architectures...

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ