[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2023042421-landowner-magnitude-a38c@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 14:53:12 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Enderborg <peter.enderborg@...y.com>,
Yingsha Xu <ysxu@...t.edu.cn>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: remove return value check of debugfs_create_dir()
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 01:32:14PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 02:20:45PM +0200, Peter Enderborg wrote:
> > On 4/24/23 13:54, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > This is very much a question of taste with a range of use cases
> > > available.
>
> > No.
> > https://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1901.2/05993.html
Please use lore.kernel.org links in the future.
> > We can do things with the debug information without filesystem enabled.
What exactly do you mean by this?
> There's issues with partially created debugfs structures getting in the
> way of people trying to debug things, just completely ignoring all
> errors can create confusion as the diagnostic information people believe
> is being shown to them ends up being partial or mistructured without any
> indication that this has happened.
How do you end up with partially created debugfs structures?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists