[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALPaoCjTS5EFWkjkbJYZYtjFPmTGf=HXj1bWwOVNcqnr4W_wkg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 15:06:45 +0200
From: Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@....com>,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
carl@...amperecomputing.com, lcherian@...vell.com,
bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com, tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com,
xingxin.hx@...nanolis.org, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/19] x86/resctrl: Access per-rmid structures by index
Hi James,
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 6:27 PM James Morse <james.morse@....com> wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> index 030d3b409768..351319403f84 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> @@ -600,7 +600,7 @@ static void clear_closid_rmid(int cpu)
> state->default_rmid = 0;
> state->cur_closid = 0;
> state->cur_rmid = 0;
> - wrmsr(MSR_IA32_PQR_ASSOC, 0, 0);
> + wrmsr(MSR_IA32_PQR_ASSOC, RESCTRL_RESERVED_CLOSID, 0);
It looks like the RMID/CLOSID params are in the wrong order in this wrmsr().
-Peter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists