linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 01/14] HP BIOSCFG driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOOmCE-N9yMn7Cvr9bK5TpAwpv7_Lam1huWRrYaFzXVtf4v_aA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Apr 2023 11:11:41 -0500
From:   Jorge Lopez <jorgealtxwork@...il.com>
To:     Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@...ch.de>
Cc:     hdegoede@...hat.com, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 01/14] HP BIOSCFG driver - Documentation

Hi Thomas,


On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 3:51 PM Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@...ch.de> wrote:
>
> On 2023-04-20 11:54:41-0500, Jorge Lopez wrote:
> > Based on the latest platform-drivers-x86.git/for-next
> > ---
> >  .../testing/sysfs-class-firmware-attributes   | 98 ++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 96 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-firmware-attributes b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-firmware-attributes
> > index 4cdba3477176..73d7b8fbc0b2 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-firmware-attributes
> > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-firmware-attributes
> > @@ -22,6 +22,12 @@ Description:
> >                       - integer: a range of numerical values
> >                       - string
> >
> > +             HP specific types
> > +             -----------------
> > +                     - ordered-list - a set of ordered list valid values
> > +                     - sure-start - report audit logs read from BIOS
>
> In the treevie you sent the Sure_Start attribute does not have
> a "current_value".
> This indicated that it's not actually a firmware attribute but just some
> standalone sysfs attribute.
>
> In this case it should not be documented here, but handled the same way
> as the SPM stuff.

I will update the documentation as indicated.

Regards,

Jorge