| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 06:33:43 +0200
From: Jinpu Wang <jinpu.wang@...os.com>
To: "Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)" <lizhijian@...itsu.com>
Cc: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@...ux.dev>,
"haris.iqbal@...os.com" <haris.iqbal@...os.com>,
"jgg@...pe.ca" <jgg@...pe.ca>, "leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next v2 3/3] RDMA/rtrs: Fix rxe_dealloc_pd warning
On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 9:29 AM Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
<lizhijian@...itsu.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 23/04/2023 11:08, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 4/23/23 09:26, Li Zhijian wrote:
> >> In current design:
> >> 1. PD and clt_path->s.dev are shared among connections.
> >> 2. every con[n]'s cleanup phase will call destroy_con_cq_qp()
> >> 3. clt_path->s.dev will be always decreased in destroy_con_cq_qp(), and
> >> when clt_path->s.dev become zero, it will destroy PD.
> >> 4. when con[1] failed to create, con[1] will not take clt_path->s.dev,
> >> but it try to decreased clt_path->s.dev
> >>
> >> So, in case create_cm(con[0]) succeeds but create_cm(con[1])
> >> fails, destroy_con_cq_qp(con[1]) will be called first which will destory
> >> the PD while this PD is still taken by con[0].
> >>
> >> Here, we refactor the error path of create_cm() and init_conns(), so that
> >> we do the cleanup in the order they are created.
> >>
> >> The warning occurs when destroying RXE PD whose reference count is not
> >> zero.
> >> -----------------------------------------------
> >> rnbd_client L597: Mapping device /dev/nvme0n1 on session client, (access_mode: rw, nr_poll_queues: 0)
> >> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> >> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 26407 at drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_pool.c:256 __rxe_cleanup+0x13a/0x170 [rdma_rxe]
> >> Modules linked in: rpcrdma rdma_ucm ib_iser rnbd_client libiscsi rtrs_client scsi_transport_iscsi rtrs_core rdma_cm iw_cm ib_cm crc32_generic rdma_rxe udp_tunnel ib_uverbs ib_core kmem device_dax nd_pmem dax_pmem nd_
> >> vme crc32c_intel fuse nvme_core nfit libnvdimm dm_multipath scsi_dh_rdac scsi_dh_emc scsi_dh_alua dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod
> >> CPU: 0 PID: 26407 Comm: rnbd-client.sh Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.2.0-rc6-roce-flush+ #53
> >> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
> >> RIP: 0010:__rxe_cleanup+0x13a/0x170 [rdma_rxe]
> >> Code: 45 84 e4 0f 84 5a ff ff ff 48 89 ef e8 5f 18 71 f9 84 c0 75 90 be c8 00 00 00 48 89 ef e8 be 89 1f fa 85 c0 0f 85 7b ff ff ff <0f> 0b 41 bc ea ff ff ff e9 71 ff ff ff e8 84 7f 1f fa e9 d0 fe ff
> >> RSP: 0018:ffffb09880b6f5f0 EFLAGS: 00010246
> >> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff99401f15d6a8 RCX: 0000000000000000
> >> RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffffbac8234b RDI: 00000000ffffffff
> >> RBP: ffff99401f15d6d0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
> >> R10: 0000000000002d82 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000001
> >> R13: ffff994101eff208 R14: ffffb09880b6f6a0 R15: 00000000fffffe00
> >> FS: 00007fe113904740(0000) GS:ffff99413bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> >> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> >> CR2: 00007ff6cde656c8 CR3: 000000001f108004 CR4: 00000000001706f0
> >> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> >> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> >> Call Trace:
> >> <TASK>
> >> rxe_dealloc_pd+0x16/0x20 [rdma_rxe]
> >> ib_dealloc_pd_user+0x4b/0x80 [ib_core]
> >> rtrs_ib_dev_put+0x79/0xd0 [rtrs_core]
> >> destroy_con_cq_qp+0x8a/0xa0 [rtrs_client]
> >> init_path+0x1e7/0x9a0 [rtrs_client]
> >> ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10
> >> ? lock_is_held_type+0xd7/0x130
> >> ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x43/0x80
> >> ? pcpu_alloc+0x3dd/0x7d0
> >> ? rtrs_clt_init_stats+0x18/0x40 [rtrs_client]
> >> rtrs_clt_open+0x24f/0x5a0 [rtrs_client]
> >> ? __pfx_rnbd_clt_link_ev+0x10/0x10 [rnbd_client]
> >> rnbd_clt_map_device+0x6a5/0xe10 [rnbd_client]
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian<lizhijian@...itsu.com>
> >> ---
> >> V2: refactor error path instead of introducing a new flag #Leon
> >> ---
> >> drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c | 55 +++++++++++---------------
> >> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c
> >> index c2065fc33a56..5234be5c6bf8 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c
> >> @@ -2039,6 +2039,7 @@ static int rtrs_clt_rdma_cm_handler(struct rdma_cm_id *cm_id,
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >> +/* The caller should the do the cleanup in case of error */
> >
> > Remove the first 'the' from above sentence.
>
> Good catch.
>
>
> >
> >> static int create_cm(struct rtrs_clt_con *con)
> >> {
> >> struct rtrs_path *s = con->c.path;
> >> @@ -2061,14 +2062,14 @@ static int create_cm(struct rtrs_clt_con *con)
> >> err = rdma_set_reuseaddr(cm_id, 1);
> >> if (err != 0) {
> >> rtrs_err(s, "Set address reuse failed, err: %d\n", err);
> >> - goto destroy_cm;
> >> + return err;
> >> }
> >> err = rdma_resolve_addr(cm_id, (struct sockaddr *)&clt_path->s.src_addr,
> >> (struct sockaddr *)&clt_path->s.dst_addr,
> >> RTRS_CONNECT_TIMEOUT_MS);
> >> if (err) {
> >> rtrs_err(s, "Failed to resolve address, err: %d\n", err);
> >> - goto destroy_cm;
> >> + return err;
> >> }
> >> /*
> >> * Combine connection status and session events. This is needed
> >> @@ -2083,29 +2084,15 @@ static int create_cm(struct rtrs_clt_con *con)
> >> if (err == 0)
> >> err = -ETIMEDOUT;
> >> /* Timedout or interrupted */
> >> - goto errr;
> >> - }
> >> - if (con->cm_err < 0) {
> >> - err = con->cm_err;
> >> - goto errr;
> >> + return err;
> >> }
> >> - if (READ_ONCE(clt_path->state) != RTRS_CLT_CONNECTING) {
> >> + if (con->cm_err < 0)
> >> + return con->cm_err;
> >> + if (READ_ONCE(clt_path->state) != RTRS_CLT_CONNECTING)
> >> /* Device removal */
> >> - err = -ECONNABORTED;
> >> - goto errr;
> >> - }
> >> + return -ECONNABORTED;
> >> return 0;
> >> -
> >> -errr:
> >> - stop_cm(con);
> >> - mutex_lock(&con->con_mutex);
> >> - destroy_con_cq_qp(con);
> >> - mutex_unlock(&con->con_mutex);
> >> -destroy_cm:
> >> - destroy_cm(con);
> >> -
> >> - return err;
> >> }
> >> static void rtrs_clt_path_up(struct rtrs_clt_path *clt_path)
> >> @@ -2333,7 +2320,7 @@ static void rtrs_clt_close_work(struct work_struct *work)
> >> static int init_conns(struct rtrs_clt_path *clt_path)
> >> {
> >> unsigned int cid;
> >> - int err;
> >> + int err, i;
> >> /*
> >> * On every new session connections increase reconnect counter
> >> @@ -2349,10 +2336,8 @@ static int init_conns(struct rtrs_clt_path *clt_path)
> >> goto destroy;
> >> err = create_cm(to_clt_con(clt_path->s.con[cid]));
> >> - if (err) {
> >> - destroy_con(to_clt_con(clt_path->s.con[cid]));
> >> + if (err)
> >> goto destroy;
> >> - }
> >> }
> >> err = alloc_path_reqs(clt_path);
> >> if (err)
> >> @@ -2363,15 +2348,21 @@ static int init_conns(struct rtrs_clt_path *clt_path)
> >> return 0;
> >> destroy:
> >> - while (cid--) {
> >> - struct rtrs_clt_con *con = to_clt_con(clt_path->s.con[cid]);
> >> + /* Make sure we do the cleanup in the order they are created */
> >> + for (i = 0; i <= cid; i++) {
> >> + struct rtrs_clt_con *con;
> >> - stop_cm(con);
> >> + if (!clt_path->s.con[i])
> >> + break;
> >> - mutex_lock(&con->con_mutex);
> >> - destroy_con_cq_qp(con);
> >> - mutex_unlock(&con->con_mutex);
> >> - destroy_cm(con);
> >> + con = to_clt_con(clt_path->s.con[i]);
> >> + if (con->c.cm_id) {
> >> + stop_cm(con);
> >> + mutex_lock(&con->con_mutex);
> >> + destroy_con_cq_qp(con);
> >> + mutex_unlock(&con->con_mutex);
> >> + destroy_cm(con);
> >> + }
> >> destroy_con(con);
> >> }
> >
> > Can we factor out a function for above? Then rtrs_clt_stop_and_destroy_conns
> > might reuse it as well.
>
> I'm open to this. but they are a bit difference IMHO.
we can do the refactor later after bugfix.
Thx
>
>
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Guoqing
Powered by blists - more mailing lists