linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/43] clk: ep93xx: add DT support for Cirrus EP93xx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202304250013.c9Px2Npt-lkp@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Apr 2023 01:17:25 +0800
From:   kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:     Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>
Cc:     oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linusw@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/43] clk: ep93xx: add DT support for Cirrus EP93xx

Hi Nikita,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on soc/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on robh/for-next linusw-pinctrl/devel linusw-pinctrl/for-next linus/master v6.3]
[cannot apply to next-20230421]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Nikita-Shubin/gpio-ep93xx-split-device-in-multiple/20230424-183649
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git for-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230424123522.18302-13-nikita.shubin%40maquefel.me
patch subject: [PATCH 12/43] clk: ep93xx: add DT support for Cirrus EP93xx
config: sparc-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230425/202304250013.c9Px2Npt-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/8621eda93e4a641c57f889ac36d2386482e92157
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Nikita-Shubin/gpio-ep93xx-split-device-in-multiple/20230424-183649
        git checkout 8621eda93e4a641c57f889ac36d2386482e92157
        # save the config file
        mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=sparc olddefconfig
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=sparc SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202304250013.c9Px2Npt-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/clk/clk-ep93xx.c: In function 'ep93xx_clk_enable':
>> drivers/clk/clk-ep93xx.c:153:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'ep93xx_syscon_swlocked_write' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     153 |         ep93xx_syscon_swlocked_write(val, psc->reg);
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors


vim +/ep93xx_syscon_swlocked_write +153 drivers/clk/clk-ep93xx.c

   140	
   141	static int ep93xx_clk_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
   142	{
   143		struct clk_psc *psc = to_clk_psc(hw);
   144		unsigned long flags = 0;
   145		u32 val;
   146	
   147		if (psc->lock)
   148			spin_lock_irqsave(psc->lock, flags);
   149	
   150		ep93xx_regmap_read(psc->reg, &val);
   151		val |= BIT(psc->bit_idx);
   152	
 > 153		ep93xx_syscon_swlocked_write(val, psc->reg);
   154	
   155		if (psc->lock)
   156			spin_unlock_irqrestore(psc->lock, flags);
   157	
   158		return 0;
   159	}
   160	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests