linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 22/22] workqueue: Don't implicitly make UNBOUND workqueues w/ @max

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZEYNjGr+14Anqgow@infradead.org>
Date:   Sun, 23 Apr 2023 22:03:08 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:     jiangshanlai@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...a.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/22] workqueue: Don't implicitly make UNBOUND
 workqueues w/ @max_active==1 ordered

On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 04:50:46PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> There aren't that many UNBOUND w/ @max_active==1 users in the tree and the
> preceding patches audited all and converted them to
> alloc_ordered_workqueue() as appropriate. This patch removes the implicit
> promotion of UNBOUND w/ @max_active==1 workqueues to ordered ones.

And because you only Cc'ed me on this patch but not the rest of the
series there is no way to make me see it.  Either cc me everywhere
because it's actually important, or preferably just drop fringe Ccs.