linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] LSM patches for v6.4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wji9GerfEOQ=9O6OOULFmpHneLPdvYtv+HM2ZK+tB3FDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Apr 2023 11:28:09 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc:     linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] LSM patches for v6.4

On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 4:53 PM Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
>
> Due to some personal logistics challenges over the next few days I'm
> sending the LSM pull request for Linux v6.4 a bit early.  Here is a
> quick summary of the changes:

Well, you only had the summary, not where to pull from or what the
resulting diffstat and shortlog would be.

Normally I'd ask for a proper new pull request, but  since you
explicitly mention the logistics challenges, I looked around.

And it was obvious enough what the thing you wanted me to pull was:
you always use the same naming format for the tags etc, and the end
result matches what you described in the summary.

So I've pulled your 'lsm-pr-20230420' tag, but in general I really do
want to see that mentioned explicitly along with the diffstat etc
noise from 'git request-pull'.

Thanks,
               Linus