[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZEbPhorHgaaY0HkP@Asurada-Nvidia>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 11:50:46 -0700
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
CC: <jgg@...dia.com>, <kevin.tian@...el.com>, <robin.murphy@....com>,
<eric.auger@...hat.com>, <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, <will@...nel.org>,
<joro@...tes.org>, <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
<jean-philippe@...aro.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<iommu@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 2/4] iommufd: Add IOMMUFD_CMD_DEVICE_SET_DATA and
IOMMUFD_CMD_DEVICE_UNSET_DATA
Hi Baolu,
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 10:44:08AM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
> On 4/23/23 3:40 PM, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > Add a new pair of ioctls to allow user space to set and unset its iommu-
> > specific device data for a passthrough device that's behind the iommu.
> >
> > On platforms with SMMUv3, this new uAPIs will be used to forward a user
> > space virtual Stream ID of a passthrough device to link to its physical
> > Stream ID and log into a lookup table, in order for the host kernel to
> > later run sanity on ATC invalidation requests from the user space, with
> > ATC_INV commands that have SID fields (virtual Stream IDs).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h | 3 +
> > drivers/iommu/iommufd/main.c | 4 ++
> > include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h | 32 ++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 120 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
> > index c649a3403797..9480cd36a8bd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
> > @@ -136,6 +136,8 @@ void iommufd_device_destroy(struct iommufd_object *obj)
> > struct iommufd_device *idev =
> > container_of(obj, struct iommufd_device, obj);
> >
> > + if (WARN_ON(idev->has_user_data))
> > + dev_iommu_ops(idev->dev)->unset_dev_user_data(idev->dev);
>
> Do you really need this WARN_ON()? The user space application can easily
> trigger this kernel WARN() by setting the user data and forgetting to
> unset it.
I can drop that, since it's a user triggerable one.
Thanks
Nic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists