linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8155p-adp: Make -cells decimal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fa548aa4-6d17-0981-227a-bed6aedcb34f@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 25 Apr 2023 10:22:06 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, agross@...nel.org,
        andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8155p-adp: Make -cells decimal

On 24/04/2023 16:38, Andrew Halaney wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 09:21:45AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 21/04/2023 22:55, Andrew Halaney wrote:
>>> The property logically makes sense in decimal, and is the standard used
>>> elsewhere.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes since v2:
>>>     * Collect tags
>>> Changes since v1:
>>>     * New patch (Konrad)
>>
>> Doing such changes per one board will be a lot of churn...
>>
> 
> Agreed, are you suggesting I drop this patch (and if we do this sort of
> cleanup to do it in bulk)? Sorry, not entirely sure I am picking up what
> that comment is implying.

Yes, I suggest to fix all Qualcomm arm64 boards with one patch. There
are just few more occurrences of this. It's also pure cleanup, no
functional change.

> 
> Personally, I'd prefer to keeping that patch as this series is trying to
> clean up the particular ethernet node.. but if the purpose of the series
> was just to clean -cells up then I'd go with the bulk approach.
> 
> So as is, I'm going to leave it like so unless you have specific advice
> against doing so.

Best regards,
Krzysztof