linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] tracing/user_events: Prevent same address and bit per process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230424214118.06b7ee07@rorschach.local.home>
Date:   Mon, 24 Apr 2023 21:41:18 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Beau Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc:     mhiramat@...nel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        dcook@...ux.microsoft.com, alanau@...ux.microsoft.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] tracing/user_events: Prevent same address and bit
 per process

On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 14:17:09 -0700
Beau Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com> wrote:

> +static bool user_event_enabler_exists(struct user_event_mm *mm,
> +				      unsigned long uaddr, unsigned char bit)
> +{
> +	struct user_event_enabler *enabler;
> +	struct user_event_enabler *next;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(enabler, next, &mm->enablers, link)
> +		if (enabler->addr == uaddr &&
> +		    (enabler->values & ENABLE_VAL_BIT_MASK) == bit)
> +			return true;
> +

Please add brackets around complex calls like the above. The no bracket
rule is not if you can get away without using it, but if there's only a
single line.

	list_for_each_entry_safe(enabler, next, &mm->enablers, link) {
		if (enabler->addr == uaddr &&
		    (enabler->values & ENABLE_VAL_BIT_MASK) == bit)
			return true;
	}

-- Steve



> +	return false;
> +}
> +