[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230425091213.9af554f08e607c6e43a54039@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 09:12:13 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Akanksha J N <akanksha@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mhiramat@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] selftests/ftrace: Add new test case which adds
multiple consecutive probes in a function
On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 15:25:56 +0530
Akanksha J N <akanksha@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Commit 97f88a3d723162 ("powerpc/kprobes: Fix null pointer reference in
> arch_prepare_kprobe()") fixed a recent kernel oops that was caused as
> ftrace-based kprobe does not generate kprobe::ainsn::insn and it gets
> set to NULL.
> Add new test case kprobe_insn_boundary.tc which adds a
> kprobe at every byte within $FUNCTION_FORK up to an offset of 256 bytes,
> to be able to test potential issues with kprobes on
> successive instructions.
> The '|| continue' is added with the echo statement to ignore errors that
> are caused by trying to add kprobes to non probeable lines and continue
> with the test.
Hi Akanksha,
Thanks for adding test case. This looks good to me.
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Akanksha J N <akanksha@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> .../test.d/kprobe/kprobe_insn_boundary.tc | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_insn_boundary.tc
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_insn_boundary.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_insn_boundary.tc
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..4f7cc318f331
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_insn_boundary.tc
> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +#!/bin/sh
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +# Copyright (C) 2023 Akanksha J N, IBM corporation
> +# description: Register multiple kprobe events in a function
> +# requires: kprobe_events
> +
> +for i in `seq 0 255`; do
> + echo p $FUNCTION_FORK+${i} >> kprobe_events || continue
> +done
> +
> +cat kprobe_events >> $testlog
> +
> +echo 1 > events/kprobes/enable
> +( echo "forked" )
> +echo 0 > events/kprobes/enable
> +echo > kprobe_events
> +echo "Waiting for unoptimizing & freeing"
> +sleep 5
> +echo "Done"
> --
> 2.31.1
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists