linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] Revert "android: binder: stop saving a pointer to the VMA"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230425014328.d6vvimziv6je5xdg@revolver>
Date:   Mon, 24 Apr 2023 21:43:28 -0400
From:   "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
To:     Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@...gle.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
        Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>,
        Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] Revert "android: binder: stop saving a pointer
 to the VMA"

* Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@...gle.com> [230424 19:11]:
> O Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 06:34:19PM -0400, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> > Cc linux-mm
> > 
> > * Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@...gle.com> [230424 16:56]:
> > > This reverts commit a43cfc87caaf46710c8027a8c23b8a55f1078f19.
> > > 
> > > This patch fixed an issue reported by syzkaller in [1]. However, this
> > > turned out to be only a band-aid in binder. The root cause, as bisected
> > > by syzkaller, was fixed by commit 5789151e48ac ("mm/mmap: undo ->mmap()
> > > when mas_preallocate() fails"). We no longer need the patch for binder.
> > > 
> > > Reverting such patch allows us to have a lockless access to alloc->vma
> > > in specific cases where the mmap_lock is not required.
> > 
> > Can you elaborate on the situation where recording a VMA pointer and
> > later accessing it outside the mmap_lock is okay?
> 
> The specifics are in the third patch of this patchset but the gist of it
> is that during ->mmap() handler, binder will complete the initialization
> of the binder_alloc structure. With the last step of this process being
> the caching of the vma pointer. Since the ordering is protected with a
> barrier we can then check alloc->vma to determine if the initialization
> has been completed.
> 
> Since this check is part of the critical path for every single binder
> transaction, the performance plummeted when we started contending for
> the mmap_lock. In this particular case, binder doesn't actually use the
> vma.

So why does binder_update_page_range() take the mmap_read_lock then use
the cached vma in the reverted patch?

If you want to use it as a flag to see if the driver is initialized, why
not use the cached address != 0?

Or better yet,

>It only needs to know if the internal structure has been fully
> initialized and it is safe to use it.

This seems like a good reason to use your own rwsem.  This is,
essentially, rolling your own lock with
smp_store_release()/smp_load_acquire() and a pointer which should not be
cached.

> 
> FWIW, this had been the design for ~15 years. The original patch is
> this: https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/457b9a6f09f0