lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2ea16959-4525-90fb-b928-d652a4613574@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Tue, 25 Apr 2023 07:06:43 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Xingyu Wu <xingyu.wu@...rfivetech.com>,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>
Cc:     Samin Guo <samin.guo@...rfivetech.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] watchdog: starfive: Fix the probe return error if PM
 and early_enable are both disabled

On 4/25/23 03:04, Xingyu Wu wrote:
> When the starfive watchdog driver uses 'pm_runtime_put_sync()' as probe
> return value at last and 'early_enable' is disabled, it could return the
> error '-ENOSYS' if the CONFIG_PM is disabled, but the driver should works
> normally.
> 
> Add a check to make sure the PM is enabled and then use
> 'pm_runtime_put_sync()' as return value when 'early_enable' is disabled.
> 
> Fixes: db728ea9c7be ("drivers: watchdog: Add StarFive Watchdog driver")
> Signed-off-by: Xingyu Wu <xingyu.wu@...rfivetech.com>
> ---
> 
> Hi, Guenter and Wim,
> 
> This patch fixes the issue of StarFive watchdog driver and rebases on
> the master branch of linux-next.
> 
> Thanks.
>   
> ---
>   drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c | 3 ++-
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c
> index 1995cceca51e..51e487e09960 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c
> @@ -492,7 +492,8 @@ static int starfive_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   		goto err_exit;
>   
>   	if (!early_enable)
> -		return pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev);
> +		if (pm_runtime_enabled(&pdev->dev))
> +			return pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev);
>   

Why not just

	if (!early_enable)
		pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev)

like almost every other caller of pm_runtime_put_sync() ?

Guenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ