linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 04/24] net: dsa: mt7530: properly support MT7531AE and MT7531BE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ce681fac-5f00-f0fc-b2cf-89907c50ee7c@arinc9.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Apr 2023 11:12:09 +0300
From:   Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
To:     Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
Cc:     Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
        DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Richard van Schagen <richard@...terhints.com>,
        Richard van Schagen <vschagen@...com>,
        Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
        Bartel Eerdekens <bartel.eerdekens@...stell8.be>,
        erkin.bozoglu@...ont.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 04/24] net: dsa: mt7530: properly support
 MT7531AE and MT7531BE

On 25.04.2023 18:04, Daniel Golle wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 11:29:13AM +0300, arinc9.unal@...il.com wrote:
>> From: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
>>
>> Introduce the p5_sgmii pointer to store the information for whether port 5
>> has got SGMII or not.
> 
> The p5_sgmii your are introducing to struct mt7530_priv is a boolean
> variable, and not a pointer.

I must've meant to say field.

> 
>>
>> Move the comment about MT7531AE and MT7531BE to mt7531_setup(), where the
>> switch is identified.
>>
>> Get rid of mt7531_dual_sgmii_supported() now that priv->p5_sgmii stores the
>> information. Address the code where mt7531_dual_sgmii_supported() is used.
>>
>> Get rid of mt7531_is_rgmii_port() which just prints the opposite of
>> priv->p5_sgmii.
>>
>> Remove P5_INTF_SEL_GMAC5_SGMII. The p5_interface_select enum is supposed to
>> represent the mode that port 5 is being used in, not the hardware
>> information of port 5. Set p5_intf_sel to P5_INTF_SEL_GMAC5 instead, if
>> port 5 is not dsa_is_unused_port().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
>> ---
> 
> Other than the comment above this change makes sense and looks good to
> me, so once you correct the commit message, you may add my Acked-by.

Will do, thanks.

Arınç