[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230426094107.27348-1-bp@alien8.de>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 11:41:07 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] tools/x86/kcpuid: Dump the correct CPUID function in error
From: "Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@...en8.de>
The tool uses the 16 least significant bits of the CPUID leaf as an
index into its array of CPUID function field descriptions.
However, when that index is non-existent, it uses the same, truncated
index to report it, which is wrong:
$ kcpuid -l 0x80000034
ERR: invalid input index (0x34)
Use the original index number in the error message.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@...en8.de>
---
tools/arch/x86/kcpuid/kcpuid.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/arch/x86/kcpuid/kcpuid.c b/tools/arch/x86/kcpuid/kcpuid.c
index 416f5b35dd8f..24b7d017ec2c 100644
--- a/tools/arch/x86/kcpuid/kcpuid.c
+++ b/tools/arch/x86/kcpuid/kcpuid.c
@@ -517,15 +517,16 @@ static void show_range(struct cpuid_range *range)
static inline struct cpuid_func *index_to_func(u32 index)
{
struct cpuid_range *range;
+ u32 func_idx;
range = (index & 0x80000000) ? leafs_ext : leafs_basic;
- index &= 0x7FFFFFFF;
+ func_idx = index & 0xffff;
- if (((index & 0xFFFF) + 1) > (u32)range->nr) {
+ if ((func_idx + 1) > (u32)range->nr) {
printf("ERR: invalid input index (0x%x)\n", index);
return NULL;
}
- return &range->funcs[index];
+ return &range->funcs[func_idx];
}
static void show_info(void)
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists