linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] Initial Rust V4L2 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 Apr 2023 15:22:14 +0200
From:   "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@...ux.net>
To:     Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc:     Deborah Brouwer <deborah.brouwer@...labora.com>,
        Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>,
        wedsonaf@...il.com, ojeda@...nel.org, mchehab@...nel.org,
        hverkuil@...all.nl, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Initial Rust V4L2 support

On 12.04.23 04:58, Theodore Ts'o wrote:

> Something that would perhaps be useful is to document (a) what
> versions of Rust is available for various distributions, or pointers
> to how to get that information for various distributions.  For
> example, you can get that information from Debian using [1].  It
> appears that Fedora isn't distributing rustc at *all*, at least
> according to [2], so apparently for Fedora people will need to install
> it from source.

As already said in my other mail, one major problem IMHO is (recent 
enough) toolchain availability for the major distros and package build
systems - including the embedded ones (ptxdist, buildroot, bitbake,
...).

IMHO, those who want Rust in the kernel, should take care of this first.
(and no: asking to download some precompiled binary from somewhere is
not any acceptable solution)

> If the goal is accelerate adoption of Rustc, and calm people's fears
> vis-a-vis using Rust, it's not enough to say, "why don't you use the
> distribution-provided version or Rust"?  It would be helpful if those
> Rust pioneers can share what versions of Rust they have tested
> against, especially for those commonly used distributions, such as
> Debian, and give us a report whether we should expect things to work,
> so we can ignore the scary warning from the build system that we're
> using an unsupported version of Rust, and if it breaks, we get to keep
> both pieces.

ACK. Maybe those folks could set up some CIs for at least building and
deploying the Rust patches on as many distros as possible - hopefully
before they're sent to lkml.


--mtx

-- 
---
Hinweis: unverschlüsselte E-Mails können leicht abgehört und manipuliert
werden ! Für eine vertrauliche Kommunikation senden Sie bitte ihren
GPG/PGP-Schlüssel zu.
---
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Free software and Linux embedded engineering
info@...ux.net -- +49-151-27565287