[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230426142054.GA1381951@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 16:20:54 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
rcu <rcu@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lance@...osl.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG : PowerPC RCU: torture test failed with __stack_chk_fail
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 09:44:22AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> How could you control which code paths don't have the stack protector?
> Just curious.
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230412-no_stackp-v2-0-116f9fe4bbe7@google.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists