linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv7 00/11] Introduce RK806 Support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4046459.irdbgypaU6@bagend>
Date:   Wed, 26 Apr 2023 17:20:52 +0200
From:   Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@...ow.org>
To:     Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Cc:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...labora.com,
        Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@...ow.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 00/11] Introduce RK806 Support

On Tuesday, 7 March 2023 16:36:06 CEST Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> The Rockchip RK3588 Evaluation Boards as well as the Rock 5
> boards and probably most other RK3588 boards use SPI connected
> RK806 PMICs. Downstream this is handled by a new driver, but
> apart from being SPI connected this chip is quite similar to
> the other Rockchip PMICs (and RK806 is promoted to also support
> I2C). Thus this series instead updates the RK808 driver(s).

I don't know if it's relevant or useful, but I tested whether this patch set 
would cause a regression on the Rock64 (rk3328), Quartz64 Model A and Quartz64 
Model B (both rk3566) and I can say that it does NOT cause a regression.

If it is relevant or useful, feel free to add my 
Tested-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@...ow.org>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)