[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4046459.irdbgypaU6@bagend>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 17:20:52 +0200
From: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@...ow.org>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...labora.com,
Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@...ow.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 00/11] Introduce RK806 Support
On Tuesday, 7 March 2023 16:36:06 CEST Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> The Rockchip RK3588 Evaluation Boards as well as the Rock 5
> boards and probably most other RK3588 boards use SPI connected
> RK806 PMICs. Downstream this is handled by a new driver, but
> apart from being SPI connected this chip is quite similar to
> the other Rockchip PMICs (and RK806 is promoted to also support
> I2C). Thus this series instead updates the RK808 driver(s).
I don't know if it's relevant or useful, but I tested whether this patch set
would cause a regression on the Rock64 (rk3328), Quartz64 Model A and Quartz64
Model B (both rk3566) and I can say that it does NOT cause a regression.
If it is relevant or useful, feel free to add my
Tested-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@...ow.org>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists