[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230426171749.213807197@goodmis.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 13:17:04 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian1@...wei.com>
Subject: [for-next][PATCH 01/11] ring-buffer: Clearly check null ptr returned by rb_set_head_page()
From: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian1@...wei.com>
In error case, 'buffer_page' returned by rb_set_head_page() is NULL,
currently check '&buffer_page->list' is equivalent to check 'buffer_page'
due to 'list' is the first member of 'buffer_page', but suppose it is not
some time, 'head_page' would be wild memory while check would be bypassed.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20230414071729.57312-1-zhengyejian1@huawei.com
Cc: <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian1@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 2d5c3caff32d..58be5b409f72 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -2054,10 +2054,11 @@ rb_insert_pages(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
struct list_head *head_page, *prev_page, *r;
struct list_head *last_page, *first_page;
struct list_head *head_page_with_bit;
+ struct buffer_page *hpage = rb_set_head_page(cpu_buffer);
- head_page = &rb_set_head_page(cpu_buffer)->list;
- if (!head_page)
+ if (!hpage)
break;
+ head_page = &hpage->list;
prev_page = head_page->prev;
first_page = pages->next;
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists