[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e0a64c2b-6178-6513-d7ba-d6a79831f21d@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 12:11:39 -0700
From: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
To: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
CC: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Adam Skladowski <a39.skl@...il.com>,
Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
<~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
"Konrad Dybcio" <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>,
Jami Kettunen <jami.kettunen@...ainline.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Jordan Crouse" <jordan@...micpenguin.net>,
Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/21] drm/msm/dpu: Use V2 DITHER PINGPONG sub-block in
SM8[34]50/SC8280XP
On 4/26/2023 12:08 PM, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> On 2023-04-26 09:24:19, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/25/2023 4:05 PM, Marijn Suijten wrote:
>>> According to downstream sources this DITHER sub-block sits at an offset
>>> of 0xe0 with version 0x20000. The PP_BLK_DITHER macro is _not_ used as
>>> downstream still says the size of the PINGPONG block is 0xd4 and not 0.
>>>
>>
>> the PINGPONG block size is 0x0 on sm8350, sm8450 and sc8280xp.
>>
>> and length of dither is 0x20 and they all start at 0xe0.
>>
>> So now does anything prevent us from using PP_BLK_DITHER macro for these?
>
> Nothing prevents it from being used (if you are referring to our
> previous conversations) besides this information not being available in
> public DTS (I simply did not know) and the fact that all these many
> fixes - however necessary they are - distract from the main topic of
> this series: bringing INTF TE support to DPU1.
>
Yeah, you could have sent these as a separate series if you wanted to
stick to this one being only intf te.
> I'll fit in that patch though, as I have to send v4 anyway.
Thanks.
>
> - Marijn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists