linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 32/43] dt-bindings: gpio: Add DT bindings ep93xx gpio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 Apr 2023 22:48:20 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linusw@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 32/43] dt-bindings: gpio: Add DT bindings ep93xx gpio

On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 6:32 PM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 03:34:48PM +0300, Nikita Shubin wrote:

> > Add YAML bindings for ep93xx SoC.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>
(...)
> > +  chip-label:
> > +    maxItems: 1
> > +    description: human readable name.
>
> Why do you need this? It's not standard and I don't see other GPIO
> controllers needing it.

Caught my eye too, Nikita can you live without this and just use dev_name()
or something to name the chip in Linux?

If it is to conform to EP93xx documentation naming I guess it should be
cirrus,ep93xx-gpio-chip-name = "..."; ?

Yours,
Linus Walleij