[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZEsFV6F4CEh2/av8@x1>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 19:29:27 -0400
From: Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com>
To: Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Input: pwm-vibra - add support for enable GPIO
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 10:34:28PM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Some pwm vibrators have a dedicated enable GPIO that needs to be set
> high so that the vibrator works. Add support for that optionally.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>
Hi Luca,
Thank you for picking up this work!
> + vibrator->enable_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "enable",
> + GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> + err = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(vibrator->enable_gpio);
> + if (err) {
> + if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request enable gpio: %d\n",
> + err);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
Take a look at dev_err_probe() to remove the -EPROBE_DEFER check.
With that fixed:
Reviewed-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists