linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] sched/cpuset: Bring back cpuset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAB8ipk-ns=d+jNkKi1sjkSQmQidziCj34COkHZt6ZkRiG47HHA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 Apr 2023 10:58:03 +0800
From:   Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@...il.com>
To:     Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc:     Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Qais Yousef <qyousef@...alina.io>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it,
        claudio@...dence.eu.com, tommaso.cucinotta@...tannapisa.it,
        bristot@...hat.com, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Wei Wang <wvw@...gle.com>, Rick Yiu <rickyiu@...gle.com>,
        Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        王科 (Ke Wang) <Ke.Wang@...soc.com>,
        zhiguo.niu@...issoc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] sched/cpuset: Bring back cpuset_mutex

HI Juri,

Would this patch be merged tobe stable-rc? In kernel5.15, we also find
that the rwsem would be blocked for a long  time, when we change the
task's cpuset cgroup.
And when we revert to the mutex, the delay would disappear.

BR
Thanks!

On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 10:50 PM Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 4/26/23 07:57, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > On 04/04/23 13:31, Waiman Long wrote:
> >> On 3/29/23 08:55, Juri Lelli wrote:
> >>> Turns out percpu_cpuset_rwsem - commit 1243dc518c9d ("cgroup/cpuset:
> >>> Convert cpuset_mutex to percpu_rwsem") - wasn't such a brilliant idea,
> >>> as it has been reported to cause slowdowns in workloads that need to
> >>> change cpuset configuration frequently and it is also not implementing
> >>> priority inheritance (which causes troubles with realtime workloads).
> >>>
> >>> Convert percpu_cpuset_rwsem back to regular cpuset_mutex. Also grab it
> >>> only for SCHED_DEADLINE tasks (other policies don't care about stable
> >>> cpusets anyway).
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
> >> I am thinking that maybe we should switch the percpu rwsem to a regular
> >> rwsem as there are cases where a read lock is sufficient. This will also
> >> avoid the potential PREEMPT_RT problem with PI and reduce the time it needs
> >> to take a write lock.
> > I'm not a big fan of rwsems for reasons like
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230321161140.HMcQEhHb@linutronix.de/, so
> > I'd vote for a standard mutex unless we have a strong argument and/or
> > numbers.
>
> That is fine for me too.
>
> Cheers,
> Longman
>