linux-kernel - RE:(2) [PATCH] scsi: ufs: core: Simplify param_set_mcq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230427084535epcms2p20fc85abb7cf2efd77866b94ecb718047@epcms2p2>
Date:   Thu, 27 Apr 2023 17:45:35 +0900
From:   Keoseong Park <keosung.park@...sung.com>
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        Keoseong Park <keosung.park@...sung.com>,
        ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        "avri.altman@....com" <avri.altman@....com>,
        "jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "stanley.chu@...iatek.com" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        "quic_asutoshd@...cinc.com" <quic_asutoshd@...cinc.com>,
        "beanhuo@...ron.com" <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE:(2) [PATCH] scsi: ufs: core: Simplify param_set_mcq_mode()

Hi Bart,
Thank you for your review.

>On 4/25/23 22:21, Keoseong Park wrote:
>> This function does not require the "ret" variable because it returns
>> only the result of param_set_bool().
>> 
>> Remove unnecessary "ret" variable and simplify the code.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Keoseong Park <keosung.park@...sung.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 8 +-------
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
>> index 9434328ba323..46c4ed478ad0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
>> @@ -108,13 +108,7 @@ static bool is_mcq_supported(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>>   
>>   static int param_set_mcq_mode(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
>>   {
>> -	int ret;
>> -
>> -	ret = param_set_bool(val, kp);
>> -	if (ret)
>> -		return ret;
>> -
>> -	return 0;
>> +	return param_set_bool(val, kp);
>>   }
>>   
>>   static const struct kernel_param_ops mcq_mode_ops = {
>
>Why do we even have the param_set_mcq_mode() callback? Has it been considered
>to remove mcq_mode_ops as in the untested patch below?

I agree with you in that it only uses param_{set,get}_bool().
So, I'll test the patch below and send it.

Best Regards,
Keoseong

>
>Thanks,
>
>Bart.
>
>diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
>index 7b1e7d7091ff..2b8c2613f7d7 100644
>--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
>+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
>@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@
>  /* Polling time to wait for fDeviceInit */
>  #define FDEVICEINIT_COMPL_TIMEOUT 1500 /* millisecs */
>
>-/* UFSHC 4.0 compliant HC support this mode, refer param_set_mcq_mode() */
>+/* UFSHC 4.0 compliant HC support this mode. */
>  static bool use_mcq_mode = true;
>
>  static bool is_mcq_supported(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>@@ -106,23 +106,7 @@ static bool is_mcq_supported(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>  	return hba->mcq_sup && use_mcq_mode;
>  }
>
>-static int param_set_mcq_mode(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
>-{
>-	int ret;
>-
>-	ret = param_set_bool(val, kp);
>-	if (ret)
>-		return ret;
>-
>-	return 0;
>-}
>-
>-static const struct kernel_param_ops mcq_mode_ops = {
>-	.set = param_set_mcq_mode,
>-	.get = param_get_bool,
>-};
>-
>-module_param_cb(use_mcq_mode, &mcq_mode_ops, &use_mcq_mode, 0644);
>+module_param(use_mcq_mode, bool, 0644);
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(use_mcq_mode, "Control MCQ mode for controllers starting from UFSHCI 4.0. 1 - enable MCQ, 0 - disable MCQ. MCQ is enabled by default");
>
>  #define ufshcd_toggle_vreg(_dev, _vreg, _on)				\