[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230427111937.2745231-5-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 13:19:37 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Crystal Wood <swood@...hat.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] locking/rtmutex: Add a lockdep assert to catch potential nested blocking
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
There used to be a BUG_ON(current->pi_blocked_on) in the lock acquisition
functions, but that vanished in one of the rtmutex overhauls.
Bring it back in form of a lockdep assert to catch code paths which take
rtmutex based locks with current::pi_blocked_on != NULL.
Reported-by: Crystal Wood <swood@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 2 ++
kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c | 2 ++
kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c | 2 ++
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index dd76c1b9b7d21..479a9487edcc2 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -1727,6 +1727,8 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
static __always_inline int __rt_mutex_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
unsigned int state)
{
+ lockdep_assert(!current->pi_blocked_on);
+
if (likely(rt_mutex_try_acquire(lock)))
return 0;
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c b/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c
index 945d474f5d27f..5be92ca5afabc 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c
@@ -133,6 +133,8 @@ static __always_inline int rwbase_read_lock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb,
{
int ret;
+ lockdep_assert(!current->pi_blocked_on);
+
if (rwbase_read_trylock(rwb))
return 0;
diff --git a/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c b/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
index 62c4a6866087a..9fe282cd145d9 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
@@ -37,6 +37,8 @@
static __always_inline void rtlock_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *rtm)
{
+ lockdep_assert(!current->pi_blocked_on);
+
if (unlikely(!rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(rtm, NULL, current)))
rtlock_slowlock(rtm);
}
--
2.40.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists