lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 27 Apr 2023 13:46:49 +0200
From:   Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, frankja@...ux.ibm.com,
        borntraeger@...ibm.com, nrb@...ux.ibm.com, nsg@...ux.ibm.com,
        seiden@...ux.ibm.com, jgg@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] KVM: s390: fix race in gmap_make_secure

On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 12:53:04 +0200
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 03:48:34PM +0200, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> > This patch fixes a potential race in gmap_make_secure and removes the
> > last user of follow_page without FOLL_GET.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
> > Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> > Fixes: 214d9bbcd3a6 ("s390/mm: provide memory management functions for protected KVM guests")
> > ---
> >  arch/s390/kernel/uv.c | 32 +++++++++++---------------------
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)  
> 
> It would be helpful if this would be a bit more descriptive. "Fix
> race" is not very helpful :)
> 
> What race does this fix?
> When can this happen?
> What are the consequences if the race window is being hit?

We are locking something we don't have a reference to, and as explained
by Jason and David in this thread <Y9J4P/RNvY1Ztn0Q@...dia.com> it can
lead to all kind of bad things, including the page getting
unmapped (MADV_DONTNEED), freed, reallocated as a larger folio and the
unlock_page() would target the wrong bit.

Also there is another race with the FOLL_WRITE, which could race
between the follow_page and the get_locked_pte.

The main point of the patch is to remove the last follow_page without
FOLL_GET or FOLL_PIN, removing the races can be considered a nice bonus.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ