[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230427134649.1e482d91@p-imbrenda>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 13:46:49 +0200
From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, frankja@...ux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@...ibm.com, nrb@...ux.ibm.com, nsg@...ux.ibm.com,
seiden@...ux.ibm.com, jgg@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] KVM: s390: fix race in gmap_make_secure
On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 12:53:04 +0200
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 03:48:34PM +0200, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> > This patch fixes a potential race in gmap_make_secure and removes the
> > last user of follow_page without FOLL_GET.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
> > Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> > Fixes: 214d9bbcd3a6 ("s390/mm: provide memory management functions for protected KVM guests")
> > ---
> > arch/s390/kernel/uv.c | 32 +++++++++++---------------------
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> It would be helpful if this would be a bit more descriptive. "Fix
> race" is not very helpful :)
>
> What race does this fix?
> When can this happen?
> What are the consequences if the race window is being hit?
We are locking something we don't have a reference to, and as explained
by Jason and David in this thread <Y9J4P/RNvY1Ztn0Q@...dia.com> it can
lead to all kind of bad things, including the page getting
unmapped (MADV_DONTNEED), freed, reallocated as a larger folio and the
unlock_page() would target the wrong bit.
Also there is another race with the FOLL_WRITE, which could race
between the follow_page and the get_locked_pte.
The main point of the patch is to remove the last follow_page without
FOLL_GET or FOLL_PIN, removing the races can be considered a nice bonus.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists