linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tpm: Re-enable TPM chip boostrapping non-tpm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <27e8289e-21a4-7d7a-231f-4a27334dd1f9@kunbus.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 Apr 2023 17:33:28 +0200
From:   Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@...bus.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
        Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        heng.su@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: Re-enable TPM chip boostrapping non-tpm_tis TPM
 drivers


Hi Jarkko,

On 27.04.23 12:52, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> ATTENTION: This e-mail is from an external sender. Please check attachments and links before opening e.g. with mouseover.
> 
> 
> On Thu, 2023-04-27 at 09:58 +0800, Pengfei Xu wrote:
>> On 2023-04-26 at 21:58:33 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>>> TPM chip bootstrapping was removed from tpm_chip_register(), and it
>>> was relocated to tpm_tis_core. This breaks all drivers which are not
>>> based on tpm_tis because the chip will not get properly initialized.
>>>
>>> Take the corrective steps:
>>> 1. Rename tpm_chip_startup() as tpm_chip_bootstrap() and make it one-shot.
>>> 2. Call tpm_chip_bootstrap() in tpm_chip_register(), which reverts the
>>>    things  as tehy used to be.
>>            ^ two space and one typo "they"
>>          Thanks for your fixed patch in short time!
>>
>>   And I tested this patch, it could not be reproduced in 155s, and the patch
>>   fixed this issue.
>>   Fixed dmesg is in attached.
>>
>> Tested-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@...el.com>
> 
> Thanks a lot! I'll take immediate action to send PR to Linus.
> 
> Lino: no worries. It was expected that such a large refactorization
> could break a thing or two. You did a good job in any case.
> 
> BR, Jarkko

I guess you are right, there will probably be more issues showing up
in the next time. I will try my best to help fixing them.
Thank you very much (also for fixing this issue)!

Best regards,
Lino