[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wiGauUNbV_1ZdxG92aWF+oqnnqdRg4z2h-FxXjB_w3Xiw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 08:38:08 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
Cc: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@...cle.com>,
Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@...bus.com>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] tpmdd: a critical bug fix for v6.4-rc1
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 4:11 AM Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> This PR fixes a critical bug in my first pull request.
That doesn't work AT ALL.
You have this duplicated line
- TPM_CHIP_FLAG_FIRMWARE_UPGRADE = BIT(7),
+ TPM_CHIP_FLAG_FIRMWARE_UPGRADE = BIT(7),
+ TPM_CHIP_FLAG_FIRMWARE_UPGRADE = BIT(7),
+ TPM_CHIP_FLAG_FIRMWARE_UPGRADE = BIT(7),
in that patch (presumably due to some edit-time fat-fingering), which
causes lots and lots of
./include/linux/tpm.h:285:9: error: redeclaration of enumerator
‘TPM_CHIP_FLAG_FIRMWARE_UPGRADE’
285 | TPM_CHIP_FLAG_FIRMWARE_UPGRADE = BIT(7),
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/tpm.h:284:9: note: previous definition of
‘TPM_CHIP_FLAG_FIRMWARE_UPGRADE’ with type ‘int’
284 | TPM_CHIP_FLAG_FIRMWARE_UPGRADE = BIT(7),
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/tpm.h:286:9: error: redeclaration of enumerator
‘TPM_CHIP_FLAG_FIRMWARE_UPGRADE’
286 | TPM_CHIP_FLAG_FIRMWARE_UPGRADE = BIT(7),
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
errors.
While I could easily just remove the duplicated lines in my merge,
that would make things non-bisectable, so I unpulled this instead.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists