[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230427100304.1807bcde@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 10:03:04 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Anjali Kulkarni <anjali.k.kulkarni@...cle.com>
Cc: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"zbr@...emap.net" <zbr@...emap.net>,
"brauner@...nel.org" <brauner@...nel.org>,
"johannes@...solutions.net" <johannes@...solutions.net>,
"ecree.xilinx@...il.com" <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>,
"leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"socketcan@...tkopp.net" <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
"petrm@...dia.com" <petrm@...dia.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] netlink: Reverse the patch which removed
filtering
On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 23:58:55 +0000 Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
> Jakub, could you please look into reviewing patches 3,4 & 5 as well?
> Patch 4 is just test code. Patch 3 is fixing bug fixes in current
> code so should be good to have - also it is not too connector
> specific. I can explain patch 5 in more detail if needed.
I don't have sufficient knowledge to review that code, sorry :(
Powered by blists - more mailing lists