lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 27 Apr 2023 18:14:14 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To:     "larry.lai" <larry.lai@...jingtech.com>
Cc:     andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
        pavel@....cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        GaryWang@...on.com.tw, musa.lin@...jingtech.com,
        jack.chang@...jingtech.com, noah.hung@...jingtech.com,
        michael.wang@...jingtech.com, Javier Arteaga <javier@...tex.com>,
        Nicola Lunghi <nicola.lunghi@...tex.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC RESEND 1/3] mfd: Add support for UP board CPLD/FPGA

On Tue, 25 Apr 2023, larry.lai wrote:

> The UP Squared board <http://www.upboard.com> implements certain
> features (pin control, onboard LEDs or CEC) through an on-board CPLD/FPGA.
> 
> This mfd driver implements the line protocol to read and write registers
> from the FPGA through regmap. The register address map is also included.
> 
> The UP Boards provide a few I/O pin headers (for both GPIO and
> functions), including a 40-pin Raspberry Pi compatible header.
> 
> This patch implements support for the FPGA-based pin controller that
> manages direction and enable state for those header pins.
> 
> Partial support UP boards:
> * UP core + CREX
> * UP core + CRST02
> 
> Signed-off-by: Javier Arteaga <javier@...tex.com>
> [merge various fixes]
> Signed-off-by: Nicola Lunghi <nicola.lunghi@...tex.com>

> Reviewed-by: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>

Wait, what?!

When did Andy or I provide you with Reviewed-by tags?

You must to apply any tag that isn't explicitly provided to you.

> Signed-off-by: larry.lai <larry.lai@...jingtech.com>
> ---
> RFC 2022/11/23 -> RFC 2023/04/25
> (1) Refer 2022/12/08 Andy Shevchenko review, cleaned up coding style
> and addressed review comments.
> PATCH V3 -> RFC 2022/11/23:
> (1) Refer 2022/11/16 Lee Jones review, cleaned up coding style and
> addressed review comments.
> (2) Description on the UP Boards FPGA register read/write protocols
> PATCH V2 -> V3:
> (1) fixed kernel test robot compiler warning
> PATCH V1 -> V2:
> (1) Synchronizing upboard github to rc2
> (2) Refer 2022/10/31 Lee Jones review, fixed some of the issues.
> ---
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/Kconfig              |  12 +
>  drivers/mfd/Makefile             |   1 +
>  drivers/mfd/upboard-fpga.c       | 527 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/mfd/upboard-fpga.h |  61 ++++
>  4 files changed, 601 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/upboard-fpga.c
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/upboard-fpga.h

I'm not even going to try and review this (again).

Looking at the subject line, this is patch is masquerading as a RESEND
of an unreviewed v1.  However, at best this is a RESEND of a reviewed
(which was ignored) v3, perhaps even just a straight v4.

Either way, it appears as though the review comments you received in v3
were ignored.  Please go back and fix those before submitting v5,
thanks.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ