[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <37c23054-1590-b33d-9299-7d5d6198f8f0@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 22:29:34 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Doug Berger <opendmb@...il.com>
Cc: Al Cooper <alcooperx@...il.com>,
XuDong Liu <m202071377@...t.edu.cn>,
Dongliang Mu <dzm91@...t.edu.cn>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] serial: 8250_bcm7271: fix leak in `brcmuart_probe`
Le 27/04/2023 à 20:19, Doug Berger a écrit :
> Smatch reports:
> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_bcm7271.c:1120 brcmuart_probe() warn:
> 'baud_mux_clk' from clk_prepare_enable() not released on lines: 1032.
>
> The issue is fixed by using a managed clock.
>
> Fixes: 41a469482de2 ("serial: 8250: Add new 8250-core based Broadcom STB driver")
> Reported-by: XuDong Liu <m202071377@...t.edu.cn>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230424125100.4783-1-m202071377@hust.edu.cn/
> Signed-off-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_bcm7271.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_bcm7271.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_bcm7271.c
> index 90ee7bc12f77..af0e1c070187 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_bcm7271.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_bcm7271.c
> @@ -1012,7 +1012,7 @@ static int brcmuart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> of_property_read_u32(np, "clock-frequency", &clk_rate);
>
> /* See if a Baud clock has been specified */
> - baud_mux_clk = of_clk_get_by_name(np, "sw_baud");
> + baud_mux_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "sw_baud");
If switching to devm_clk_get(), maybe devm_clk_get_enabled() could also
be an option to fix both issues and avoid adding some LoC.
The order of operation in the remove function would then be different. I
don't know if it can be an issue.
Just my 2c.
CJ
> if (IS_ERR(baud_mux_clk)) {
> if (PTR_ERR(baud_mux_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists