| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAM9d7chavGHmtKiVkAo7fpUm=B3r3xNYgW__6dZe9D+3nmy7dA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 14:00:39 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ahmad Yasin <ahmad.yasin@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Perry Taylor <perry.taylor@...el.com>,
Samantha Alt <samantha.alt@...el.com>,
Caleb Biggers <caleb.biggers@...el.com>,
Weilin Wang <weilin.wang@...el.com>,
Edward Baker <edward.baker@...el.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Florian Fischer <florian.fischer@...q.space>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Suzuki Poulouse <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Kang Minchul <tegongkang@...il.com>,
Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/40] perf stat: Introduce skippable evsels
Hello,
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 1:21 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 11:54 AM Liang, Kan <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2023-04-26 3:00 a.m., Ian Rogers wrote:
> > > Perf stat with no arguments will use default events and metrics. These
> > > events may fail to open even with kernel and hypervisor disabled. When
> > > these fail then the permissions error appears even though they were
> > > implicitly selected. This is particularly a problem with the automatic
> > > selection of the TopdownL1 metric group on certain architectures like
> > > Skylake:
> > >
> > > ```
> > > $ perf stat true
> > > Error:
> > > Access to performance monitoring and observability operations is limited.
> > > Consider adjusting /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_paranoid setting to open
> > > access to performance monitoring and observability operations for processes
> > > without CAP_PERFMON, CAP_SYS_PTRACE or CAP_SYS_ADMIN Linux capability.
> > > More information can be found at 'Perf events and tool security' document:
> > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/perf-security.html
> > > perf_event_paranoid setting is 2:
> > > -1: Allow use of (almost) all events by all users
> > > Ignore mlock limit after perf_event_mlock_kb without CAP_IPC_LOCK
> > >> = 0: Disallow raw and ftrace function tracepoint access
> > >> = 1: Disallow CPU event access
> > >> = 2: Disallow kernel profiling
> > > To make the adjusted perf_event_paranoid setting permanent preserve it
> > > in /etc/sysctl.conf (e.g. kernel.perf_event_paranoid = <setting>)
> > > ```
> > >
> > > This patch adds skippable evsels that when they fail to open won't
> > > fail and won't appear in output. The TopdownL1 events, from the metric
> > > group, are marked as skippable. This turns the failure above to:
> > >
> > > ```
> > > $ perf stat true
> > >
> > > Performance counter stats for 'true':
> > >
> > > 1.26 msec task-clock:u # 0.328 CPUs utilized
> > > 0 context-switches:u # 0.000 /sec
> > > 0 cpu-migrations:u # 0.000 /sec
> > > 49 page-faults:u # 38.930 K/sec
> > > 176,449 cycles:u # 0.140 GHz (48.99%)
> > > 122,905 instructions:u # 0.70 insn per cycle
> > > 28,264 branches:u # 22.456 M/sec
> > > 2,405 branch-misses:u # 8.51% of all branches
> > >
> > > 0.003834565 seconds time elapsed
> > >
> > > 0.000000000 seconds user
> > > 0.004130000 seconds sys
> > > ```
> >
> > If the same command runs with root permission, a different output will
> > be displayed as below:
> >
> > $ sudo ./perf stat sleep 1
> >
> > Performance counter stats for 'sleep 1':
> >
> > 0.97 msec task-clock # 0.001 CPUs
> > utilized
> > 1 context-switches # 1.030 K/sec
> > 0 cpu-migrations # 0.000 /sec
> > 67 page-faults # 69.043 K/sec
> > 1,135,552 cycles # 1.170 GHz
> > (50.51%)
> > 1,126,446 instructions # 0.99 insn
> > per cycle
> > 252,904 branches # 260.615 M/sec
> > 7,297 branch-misses # 2.89% of
> > all branches
> > 22,518 CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.REF_XCLK # 23.205
> > M/sec
> > 56,994 INT_MISC.RECOVERY_CYCLES_ANY # 58.732 M/sec
> >
> > The last two events are useless.
>
> You missed the system wide (-a) flag.
>
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
> > It's not reliable to rely on perf_event_open()/kernel to tell whether
> > an event is available or skippable. Kernel wouldn't check a specific event.
> >
> > The patch works for the non-root mode is just because the event requires
> > root permission. It's rejected by the kernel because of lacking
> > permission. But if the same command runs with root privileges, the trash
> > events are printed as above.
> >
> > I think a better way is to check the HW capability and decided whether
> > to append the TopdownL1 metrics.
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230427182906.3411695-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com/
Maybe we can also check if the event is actually enabled like
checking the enabled_time. Then skip the skippable and not
enabled ones.
Thanks,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists