lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c704568d-16d1-bbd8-2b59-1d719f2bcf8c@wanadoo.fr>
Date:   Fri, 28 Apr 2023 09:33:01 +0200
From:   Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To:     Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@...dia.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        "linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "kbusch@...nel.org" <kbusch@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvmet: Reorder fields in 'struct nvmet_ns'

Le 28/04/2023 à 01:12, Chaitanya Kulkarni a écrit :
> (+Keith, for host side)
>> ---
>> More aggressive grouping could be done to be more future proof, but the
>> way the struct nvmet_ns is written suggest that some fields should be
>> kept together. So keep grouping as-is.
>>
>>
> 
> you can send RFC and I'll be happy to take a look if it's going
> have any benefit, it will take some time though..
> 
> for host side :-
> 
> while you are at it, it might be useful to take a look at the structures
> that are accessed in the fast path on the host side ?

Ok, why not, but can you help identifying these structures or places 
considered as fast path?

CJ

> 
> unless there is some reason for not doing that ...
> 
> -ck
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ