[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <76534699-e270-b450-c18e-f7c35c325bcf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 14:40:24 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@...edance.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] sched/numa: add per-process numa_balancing
On 4/27/23 12:17, Gang Li wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looks like there are no objections or comments. Do you have any ideas?
>
> Can we merge this patch in the next merge window.
>
We're at 6.4 merge window, so the maintainer focus is to send PR updates
to Linus. And this series didn't get applied before this merge window.
Wait until 6.4-rc1 is out and reroll.
Thanks.
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Powered by blists - more mailing lists