[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f6b869ea-979c-efda-d454-8dc688d1986b@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 08:53:52 +0800
From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ceph: Reorder fields in 'struct ceph_snapid_map'
On 4/28/23 02:05, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Group some variables based on their sizes to reduce holes.
> On x86_64, this shrinks the size of 'struct ceph_snapid_map' from 72 to 64
> bytes.
>
> When such a structure is allocated, because of the way memory allocation
> works, when 72 bytes were requested, 96 bytes were allocated.
>
> So, on x86_64, this change saves 32 bytes per allocation and has the
> structure fit in a single cacheline.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
> Using pahole
>
> Before:
> ======
> struct ceph_snapid_map {
> struct rb_node node __attribute__((__aligned__(8))); /* 0 24 */
> struct list_head lru; /* 24 16 */
> atomic_t ref; /* 40 4 */
>
> /* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */
>
> u64 snap; /* 48 8 */
> dev_t dev; /* 56 4 */
>
> /* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */
>
> /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */
> long unsigned int last_used; /* 64 8 */
>
> /* size: 72, cachelines: 2, members: 6 */
> /* sum members: 64, holes: 2, sum holes: 8 */
> /* forced alignments: 1 */
> /* last cacheline: 8 bytes */
> } __attribute__((__aligned__(8)));
> ---
> fs/ceph/mds_client.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/mds_client.h b/fs/ceph/mds_client.h
> index 0598faa50e2e..2328dbda5ab6 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/mds_client.h
> +++ b/fs/ceph/mds_client.h
> @@ -355,8 +355,8 @@ struct ceph_snapid_map {
> struct rb_node node;
> struct list_head lru;
> atomic_t ref;
> - u64 snap;
> dev_t dev;
> + u64 snap;
> unsigned long last_used;
> };
>
This looks good to me. Thanks.
Will apply it to the testing branch.
- Xiubo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists