[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877ctw5mdp.ffs@tglx>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 12:31:14 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Yujie Liu <yujie.liu@...el.com>
Cc: Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>,
oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev, lkp@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
Vikram Sethi <vsethi@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] genirq: Use the maple tree for IRQ descriptors
management
Yujie!
On Fri, Apr 28 2023 at 09:33, Yujie Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 02:08:54PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Can you please retest this on v6.3 and report back when the problem
>> persists?
>
> Thanks for your help looking into this problem.
>
> The problem persists when tested on v6.3, but not 100% reproducible.
> We ran the test on v6.3 and v6.3+patch each for 20 runs. There are 9
> failed runs on v6.3+patch, while v6.3 is all clean. Full dmesg is
> attached.
Under the assumption that the code is correct, then the effect of this
patch is that it changes the timing. Sigh.
1) Does this happen with a 64-bit kernel too?
2) Can you enable the irq_vector:vector_*.* tracepoints and provide
the trace?
And please provide /proc/interrupts from that machine.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists