linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] io_uring: add support for getdents

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZEutuerMIcKpWAfP@codewreck.org>
Date:   Fri, 28 Apr 2023 20:27:53 +0900
From:   Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
To:     Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc:     Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
        Stefan Roesch <shr@...com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] io_uring: add support for getdents

Dominique Martinet wrote on Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 03:14:52PM +0900:
> > We already pass a struct dir_context to ->iterate_shared(), so we
> > have a simple way to add context specific flags down the filesystem
> > from iterate_dir(). This is similar to the iocb for file data IO
> > that contains the flags field that holds the IOCB_NOWAIT context for
> > io_uring based IO. So the infrastructure to plumb it all the way
> > down the fs implementation of ->iterate_shared is already there.
> 
> Sure, that sounds like a good approach that isn't breaking the API (not
> breaking iterate/iterate_shared implementations that don't look at the
> flags and allowing the fs that want to look at it to do so)

Hmm actually I said that, but io_getdents() needs to know if the flag
will be honored or not (if it will be honored, we can call this when
issue_flags & IO_URING_F_NONBLOCK but if we're not sure the fs handles
it then we risk blocking)

I'm not familiar with this part of the VFS, but I do not see any kind of
flags for the filesystem to signal if it'll handle it or not -- this is
actually similar to iterate vs. iterate_shared so that'll mean adding
iterate_shared_hasnonblock or something, which is getting silly.

I'm sure you understand this better than me and I'm missing something
obvious here, but I don't think I'll be able to make something I'm happy
with here (in a reasonable timeframe anyway).


Thanks,
-- 
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus