linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: usb: qcom,dwc3: Add bindings for SA8775P

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Apr 2023 15:27:04 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Shazad Hussain <quic_shazhuss@...cinc.com>, agross@...nel.org,
        andersson@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org
Cc:     dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, athierry@...hat.com, robh@...nel.org,
        konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: usb: qcom,dwc3: Add bindings for
 SA8775P

On 28/04/2023 15:08, Shazad Hussain wrote:
> Add the compatible string for SA8775P SoC from Qualcomm.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shazad Hussain <quic_shazhuss@...cinc.com>
> ---

(...)

> +  - if:
> +      properties:
> +        compatible:
> +          contains:
> +            enum:
> +              - qcom,sa8775p-dwc3
> +    then:
> +      properties:
> +        interrupts:
> +          minItems: 3
> +          maxItems: 4
> +        interrupt-names:
> +          minItems: 3
> +          items:
> +            - const: pwr_event
> +            - const: dp_hs_phy_irq
> +            - const: dm_hs_phy_irq
> +            - const: ss_phy_irq

Why the last interrupt line is optional? Is it really optional?

Best regards,
Krzysztof