[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230428152206.GA1464060@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 17:22:06 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Hou Wenlong <houwenlong.hwl@...group.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...omium.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@...group.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/43] x86/pie: Make kernel image's virtual address
flexible
For some raison I didn't get 0/n but did get all of the others. Please
keep your Cc list consistent.
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 05:50:40PM +0800, Hou Wenlong wrote:
> - It is not allowed to reference global variables in an alternative
> section since RIP-relative addressing is not fixed in
> apply_alternatives(). Fortunately, all disallowed relocations in the
> alternative section can be captured by objtool. I believe that this
> issue can also be fixed by using objtool.
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/Y9py2a5Xw0xbB8ou@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Powered by blists - more mailing lists