linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] lsm: move hook comments docs to security/security.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Apr 2023 12:05:49 -0400
From:   Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lsm: move hook comments docs to security/security.c

On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 10:46 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
> On 4/28/23 07:43, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 11:09 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Fix one kernel-doc warning, but invesigating that led to other
> >> kernel-doc movement (lsm_hooks.h to security.c) that needs to be
> >> fixed also.
> >>
> >> include/linux/lsm_hooks.h:1: warning: no structured comments found
> >>
> >> Fixes: e261301c851a ("lsm: move the remaining LSM hook comments to security/security.c")
> >> Fixes: 1cd2aca64a5d ("lsm: move the io_uring hook comments to security/security.c")
> >> Fixes: 452b670c7222 ("lsm: move the perf hook comments to security/security.c")
> >> Fixes: 55e853201a9e ("lsm: move the bpf hook comments to security/security.c")
> >> Fixes: b14faf9c94a6 ("lsm: move the audit hook comments to security/security.c")
> >> Fixes: 1427ddbe5cc1 ("lsm: move the binder hook comments to security/security.c")
> >> Fixes: 43fad2821876 ("lsm: move the sysv hook comments to security/security.c")
> >> Fixes: ecc419a44535 ("lsm: move the key hook comments to security/security.c")
> >> Fixes: 742b99456e86 ("lsm: move the xfrm hook comments to security/security.c")
> >> Fixes: ac318aed5498 ("lsm: move the Infiniband hook comments to security/security.c")
> >> Fixes: 4a49f592e931 ("lsm: move the SCTP hook comments to security/security.c")
> >> Fixes: 6b6bbe8c02a1 ("lsm: move the socket hook comments to security/security.c")
> >> Fixes: 2c2442fd46cd ("lsm: move the AF_UNIX hook comments to security/security.c")
> >> Fixes: 2bcf51bf2f03 ("lsm: move the netlink hook comments to security/security.c")
> >> Fixes: 130c53bfee4b ("lsm: move the task hook comments to security/security.c")
> >> Fixes: a0fd6480de48 ("lsm: move the file hook comments to security/security.c")
> >> Fixes: 9348944b775d ("lsm: move the kernfs hook comments to security/security.c")
> >> Fixes: 916e32584dfa ("lsm: move the inode hook comments to security/security.c")
> >> Fixes: 08526a902cc4 ("lsm: move the filesystem hook comments to security/security.c")
> >> Fixes: 36819f185590 ("lsm: move the fs_context hook comments to security/security.c")
> >> Fixes: 1661372c912d ("lsm: move the program execution hook comments to security/security.c")
> >> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> >> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
> >> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
> >> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
> >> Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
> >> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
> >> Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
> >> Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>
> >> Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org
> >> ---
> >>  Documentation/bpf/prog_lsm.rst             |    2 +-
> >>  Documentation/security/lsm-development.rst |    6 +++---
> >>  Documentation/security/lsm.rst             |    2 +-
> >>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > Thanks Randy.  Did you want to take this via the doc tree, or would
> > you prefer if I pulled this into the LSM tree?
>
> I think that the LSM tree would be appropriate for it.

Fair enough, I just merged this into the lsm/stable-6.4 branch and
I'll send this up to Linus shortly.

-- 
paul-moore.com