[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6dca757e-74ac-773d-2a50-4e48b2f56880@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2023 01:41:02 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
syzbot <syzbot+b7c3ba8cdc2f6cf83c21@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: tty_io: remove hung_up_tty_fops
On 2023/04/29 1:27, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> I see this change has shown up in -next as commit 4c87e9e5479b ("tty:
> tty_io: remove hung_up_tty_fops"), where it causes the following warning
> for configurations without CONFIG_COMPAT (I used ARCH=arm defconfig):
>
> drivers/tty/tty_io.c:446:13: warning: 'hung_up_tty_compat_ioctl' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> 446 | static long hung_up_tty_compat_ioctl(struct file *file,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> I am not sure if you just added that patch for additional test coverage
> or for final acceptance but the following diff resolves this warning for
> me, perhaps it can be folded in for a v2?
Thank you for reporting. Yes, moving the definition will solve the warning.
I'm testing this patch using my volatile tree before getting merged to a
permanent tree.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists