linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] btrfs: parent bytenr must be aligned to sector size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Apr 2023 18:44:25 +0200
From:   David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To:     Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
Cc:     Анастасия Белова 
        <abelova@...ralinux.ru>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lvc-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: parent bytenr must be aligned to sector size

On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 08:25:14PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2023/4/26 19:53, Анастасия Белова wrote:
> > From: Anastasia Belova <abelova@...ralinux.ru>
> > 
> > Change nodesize to sectorsize in alignment check
> > in print_extent_item. Change requirement in comment.
> > 
> > Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
> > 
> > Fixes: ea57788eb76d ("btrfs: require only sector size alignment for parent eb bytenr")
> > Signed-off-by: Anastasia Belova <abelova@...ralinux.ru>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
> 
> A little surprised that a static checker can even find such hidden problem.

I've seen in Coverity a fuzzy report like "there are 8 cases that do
thing X and this one does not, is it expected?" which is basically just
pattern matching but can be caused by copy&paste mistakes.