linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 13/23] RISC-V: cpufeature: Add ACPI support in riscv_fill

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 29 Apr 2023 11:31:20 +0100
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To:     Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Weili Qian <qianweili@...wei.com>,
        Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@...ilicon.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 13/23] RISC-V: cpufeature: Add ACPI support in
 riscv_fill_hwcap()

Hey Sunil,

On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 11:50:27PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:

> @@ -103,14 +109,36 @@ void __init riscv_fill_hwcap(void)
>  
>  	bitmap_zero(riscv_isa, RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX);
>  
> -	for_each_of_cpu_node(node) {
> +	if (!acpi_disabled) {
> +		status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_RHCT, 0, &rhct);
> +		if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> +			return;
> +	}
> +
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>  		unsigned long this_hwcap = 0;
>  		DECLARE_BITMAP(this_isa, RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX);
>  		const char *temp;
>  
> -		if (of_property_read_string(node, "riscv,isa", &isa)) {
> -			pr_warn("Unable to find \"riscv,isa\" devicetree entry\n");
> -			continue;
> +		if (acpi_disabled) {
> +			node = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
> +			if (node) {
> +				rc = of_property_read_string(node, "riscv,isa", &isa);
> +				of_node_put(node);
> +				if (rc) {
> +					pr_warn("Unable to find \"riscv,isa\" devicetree entry\n");
> +					continue;
> +				}
> +			} else {
> +				pr_warn("Unable to find cpu node\n");
> +				continue;

I was poking at this the last few days and went back to look at the ACPI
code again. Is there a reason we don't do early-return here? IOW:

	node = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
	if (!node) {
		pr_warn()
		continue;
	}

	rc = of_property_read_string(node, "riscv,isa", &isa);
	of_node_put(node);
	if (rc) {
		pr_warn();
		continue;
	}

Cheers,
Conor.

> +			}
> +		} else {
> +			rc = acpi_get_riscv_isa(rhct, cpu, &isa);
> +			if (rc < 0) {
> +				pr_warn("Unable to get ISA for the hart - %d\n", cpu);
> +				continue;
> +			}
>  		}
>  
>  		temp = isa;
> @@ -243,6 +271,9 @@ void __init riscv_fill_hwcap(void)

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)